[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)

Subject: Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 23:45:44 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail,uk.transport.london
References: <92vtoe$igr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3a54256a@news.iprolink.co.nz> <K%h66.17252$0x5.1409729@news3.cableinet.net>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:28145

Christine Hope wrote:

> I must point out that the press were wrong yet again!
>
> The Signaller only cut the power to the Third Rail because he thought that
> the trains were going to collide and an accident occur, not to prevent the
> collision as the trains would have continued to coast along without power.

Thankyou.  His actions now make perfect sense.

--
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
------------------------------------
These comments are made in a private
capacity and do not represent the
official view of State Rail.
C.O.W.S. Page 11.

References:
- Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: james_shugg@my-deja.com
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: David McLoughlin <davemcl@NO***damned***SPAMiprolink.co.nz>
- Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
  - From: "Christine Hope" <christine.hope@blueyonder.co.uk>

Prev by Date: $$$ NEW WAY!! TO MAKE FAST CASH $$$
Next by Date: Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
Prev by thread: Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
Next by thread: Re: Near miss at Victoria (London)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread