[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: St.Albans rail crossing
- Subject: Re: St.Albans rail crossing
- From: amorton@mudguard.ee.mu.oz.au (Anthony Morton)
- Date: 25 Apr 2001 12:33:38 GMT
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Dept. of Elec. Eng, University of Melbourne
- References: <3B255D8F@MailAndNews.com> <B70BACC4.2DD1%markbau@earthlink.net>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:35773
Mark Bau <markbau@earthlink.net> wrote:
>I'm not going to dispute your figures (although I wonder who would pay the
>10 - 15 million) but St. Albans is a bit different due to the fact that
>freight trains use the line. In order to avoid a very weird track profile
>and an excessive grade the length of the underpass would have to be much
>longer than on a track that only runs sparks. Elsternwick is short and steep
>and works fine on a spark only line but it would have to be done much
>differently at St. Albans.
Perhaps a better comparison is with the grade-separation treatments on the
Frankston line around Moorabbin or the Lilydale line around Box Hill. Both
these lines carry freight IIRC.
TM