[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: XPT's Reduced

Subject: Re: XPT's Reduced
From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 21:30:28 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <3ad3f993.14647664@news.dingoblue.net.au> <3AD40502.1D6E996C@fang.omni.com.au> <__TA6.142038$lj4.4402157@news6.giganews.com> <3ad413df@news.iprimus.com.au> <gyUA6.142071$lj4.4402935@news6.giganews.com> <hVUA6.954$482.4740@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <3ad42b26$0$25468$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:34741

"James C." <james_ccj@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
3ad42b26$0$25468$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3ad42b26$0$25468$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
|
| > Facing the reality of the situation I believe it would be more efficient
if
| > the State Government pulled the XPT's off interstate and long distance
intra
| > state services and paid a subsidy to the airlines to cart pensioners and
| > other welfare recipients around.
|
| Don't forget XPT/Xplorer is not just serving interstate passengers, also
| they serve small towns along the way. Might be too expensive to subsidy
| regional airline to Harden, Yass etc.


Why should pensioners get any long distance travel subsidy at all?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: XPT's Reduced
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>

References:
- XPT's Reduced
  - From: (Jack)
- Re: XPT's Reduced
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: XPT's Reduced
  - From: "Erk" <erk@erkV69.au.com>
- Re: XPT's Reduced
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: XPT's Reduced
  - From: "Rjaygee" <dartmouthmotel@bigpond.com>
- Re: XPT's Reduced
  - From: "James C." <james_ccj@optusnet.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: XPT's Reduced
Next by Date: Re: XPT's Reduced
Prev by thread: Re: tilt train make XPT looks bad
Next by thread: Re: XPT's Reduced
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread