[OT] Camera's & picture quality... WAS Re: My trip around the Circle - NSW

["Skippy" <fowler9@skippy9spammeifyoudare.fsnet.co.uk>]

Hey guys,

This has now gone OT but what the hell. I'm waiting till I come home to get
a digi camera duty free (WOO HOO) & have seen a great Fujifilm 1 for £150
(around AU$375) can go up to 1280 * 1040 (I think can't remember screen size
now) but for the time being I have been using a Canon AE1 thats 2 years
older than me (which makes it 25 years old) & even tho they are not on
trains (some to come shortly) you can see the results on this page
http://www.geocities.com/dr_green_ae/picturepage.html

Skippy

PS: A little secret that if you are a serious photographer you would know.
If you use Fuji 35mm film for your pics take them to a Kodak developer &
vice versa. Dunno about Konica & the cheapo's


"John Boxall" <box@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
39bdbfa4.2367189@news.ozemail.com.au">news:39bdbfa4.2367189@news.ozemail.com.au...
> Here here.
>
> John Boxall
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.ozemail.com.au/~box/rail
> Phone 0416 292699 Fax 0416 011266
> box@ozemail.com.au
>
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 15:56:42 +1000, "Erk" <erk@erkV69.au.com> wrote:
>
> >Grahame
> >
> >Very good quality digital cameras are very expensive when compared to the
> >other type of cameras. I've just purchased an SLR camera (even though I
was
> >using my compact camera at the time). I have experimented with the budget
> >digi cameras and the results refelcted this.
> >
> >--
> >Eric
> >www.erk.au.com
> >erk@erkV69.au.com
> >(Remove the V69 to reply)
> >
> >Grahame wrote in message <5mdv5.49009$c5.136147@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>...
> >|A digital camera would be quicker than waiting for the developers!
> >|
> >
> >
> >
>