Re: [General] - Content of aus.rail

["Chris Parnell" <chspnll@hotkey.net.au>]

He [Bedansky] was also named in the event that caused a moderator to spit
the dummy on Aus Loco and all the changes rolled into aus.loco [for the
better, mind you]......
<antstig@my-deja.com> wrote in message 8q3s3e$ub9$1@nnrp1.deja.com">news:8q3s3e$ub9$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> Hi Ronald,
> this is your opinion and you are entitled to it. It is the diversity of
> opinion mixed in with fact, genuine personal observations and rational
> discussion plus some humour (you do know the meaning of that word).
>
> Very many people (surprise, surprise!) work on the railways and
> therefore have a wealth of information and experience to share.
>
> So why don't you share your experiences etc whether it is as a
> passenger (what UK railways patronisingly call "customer") or railway
> worker.
>
> Ronald, you only get out what you put in.
>
> Regards
>
> Frank
>
> In article <Kc2x5.52457$c5.147021@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>,
>   "Ronald BESDANSKY" <ronbest@bigpond.com> wrote:
> > Just having a quick, late-night look at aus.rail. Thinks - "Wouldn't
> it be
> > nice if  messages  consisted of provable fact, genuine personal
> > observations, news from reliable sources, and rational discussion,
> rather
> > than personal denigration, baseless conjecture, displays of unfounded
> bias,
> > and general time-wasting."
> >
> > Perhaps messages should be required to display their status in their
> > headings, e.g. - "What I saw", "What I heard from a usually reliable
> > source", "What I know because it's part of my job to know", and such
> like,
> > then we might be able to avoid wasting time reading some of the
> useless crap
> > of which so many messages seem to consist.
> >
> > Rgds
> >
> > Ron BESDANSKY
> >
> >
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.