[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Photo help - last night @ PLP
- Subject: Re: Photo help - last night @ PLP
- From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:17:32 GMT
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: bleah
- References: <39eea368$1@news.iprimus.com.au>
- User-Agent: Xnews/03.08.04
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:22122
Erk <erk@erkV69.au.com> wrote in article <39eea368$1@news.iprimus.com.au>:
>Help!
>
>Venue - Paralympic Park Special Event Gunzel Spot, last night
>Time - Darkness outside, usual high lighting level inside station
>Film - Kodak 800ASA
>Camera - newish Pentax MZ50 with Sigma lens 70-300mm
>Shutter speed - 1/250th of a second
>F stop 5.6
>Result - Severe underexposure on various lens lengths and pics at night.
>
>What did I do wrong? Most of my day shots with 400 were ok. I had no
>problems with the same film, same conditions with my compact camera
>before.......
Assuming you shot in auto, set the camera to manual, and meter from a few
different spots. Assuming you're above an S set, my choice would be to set
the camera to spot metering (does the MZ50 do this?) and meter off the roof
of the train. I've found that lights can be an absolute killer when you
have the camera set to the default (I think it's 7 segment) metering mode.
On the other hand, try the same on another roll of the same film, and
process at a different lab and see what sort of results youre getting.
Personally, I would be using a slower film and a tripod - but that's me (:
[Note: I am by no means a professional photographer, so my solutions may be
very wrong]
M.
--
(To email me just remove ".spam" off my email address).
Whip me, Beat me, just don't Windows ME
- Prev by Date:
Re: Very Interesting Story!
- Next by Date:
B,U.I-L,D. -Y,O.U- ,C.A-B,L.E- ,B.O-X, .D-E`S`C`R`A`M`B`L`E`R,`,`,,,,`, 452
- Prev by thread:
Photo help - last night @ PLP
- Next by thread:
Re: Photo help - last night @ PLP
- Index(es):