Re: Time Warner or AOL busting your balls? BUST BACK! Message the FCC with your comment! LINK to F.C.C. HERE! 4727

["sean" <sean@hello.springwood.rail>]

Does that have anything to do with Aus.Rail? Nup
AOL is lame anyway. always have and always will.

<ujkjwz@aol.com> wrote in message
news:erFF5.307847$TF4.2442077@telenews.teleline.es...
> The merger between AOL & Time Warner will be approved -
> BUT - the F.C.C. is going to require some form of open access.
> The question is - open access for WHOM? Will the conditions
> protect ONLY THE CORPORATIONS or will they also protect YOU
> the END USER?
>
> This is what AOL and Time Warner have to say about censorship
> and speed capping:
>
> IF TIME WARNER DETERMINES THAT THE SUBSCRIBER HAS FAILED TO
> COMPLY WITH THE SERVICE'S STANDARDS OF CONDUCT OR LIMITS ON
> BANDWIDTH UTILIZATION, TIME WARNER MAY SUSPEND SUBSCRIBER'S
> ACCOUNT.  TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS SHALL HAVE THE SOLE AND
> UNREVIEWABLE RIGHT TO DETERMINE WHETHER CONTENT VIOLATES
> THESE STANDARDS.
>
> DID YOU KNOW:
>
> These are the things that Colette Lantelme, Security Administrator
> of Road Runner, claims are against the Road Runner Acceptable Use
> Policy.
>
> 1.  Posting a message on any "For Sale" message board.
> 2.  Listing a product on any Ebay, Ubid, or similar service. (Boy, is
>     EBAY gonna be PISSED!)
> 3.  Announcing a job availability.
> 4.  Replying to a job availability.
> 5.  Mentioning that the user had tried any product and found
>     it satisfactory - or unsatisfactory.
> 6.  Posting a message to any "personals" board.
> 7.  Asking a user for a date.
> 8.  Calling attention to any commercial or non-commercial
>     website, including personal websites provided as part
>     of the purchase price of the service sold by Time-Warner.
> 9.  Calling attention to any IRC chat channel.
>
> DID YOU KNOW:
>
> AOL cancelled the account of the President of the Chemically
> Disabled Americans - they said it was a commercial usage!  The
> president ran it from his bedroom.  As a public service.  His
> comment expressing his outrage is contained in the F.C.C. file.
>
> Want to say that Al Gore can't be elected because he is a democrat?
> No problem!  Want to say that Leiberman can't be elected because he
> is Jewish? BANNED FROM AOL!
>
> A very small effort on your part can well induce the F.C.C. to
> outlaw this censorship and Speed Capping, and protect YOU as well
> as the corporations.  You have some powerful allies; Consumer's Union,
> Disney, and many commercial software companies.  Even the Attorney
> General of the State of Connecticut is on YOUR side - you may read
> their petitions at the link below.
>
> But YOU MUST HELP!
>
> You can F.I.L.E YOUR C.O.M.M.E.N.T IN THE O.F.F.I.C.I.A.L C.A.S.E FILE!
>
> ---> This is NOT merely a EMAIL message which will be ignored <---
>
> Any response which you file will be an OFFICIAL document included in
> the F.C.C. FILINGS!
> It will appear in the OFFICIAL CASE FILE as a comment
> read by ALL THE ATTORNEYS who are participating in the action, as well
> as ALL THE F.C.C. C.O.M.M.I.S.S.I.O.N.E.R.S! It will remain there
> FOREVER as part of the O.F.F.I.C.I.A.L R.E.C.O.R.D of the AOL - Time
> Warner merger! With YOUR name on it!
>
> Since this internet campaign started, approximately 250 comments have
> been received by the F.C.C from individuals.  (Some are funny as hell!)
> We need twice that!
>
> The FCC is on the verge of requiring the protections this letter asks
> for.  Your letter might PUSH THEM OVER THE EDGE and make the internet
> a BETTER PLACE for EVERYONE, INCLUDING YOU!
>
> PLEASE - can you HELP PROTECT IRC and USENET?  SEND the SAMPLE COMMENT
> to the F.C.C!
>
> MAKE A DIFFERENCE TO USENET AND IRC!  This letter WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE
> if there are enough of them received by the FCC.  If at least 500
> letters are received, we can probably count on the FCC to take decisive
> action to prohibit both censorship and speed capping - and to protect
> the users, not merely the corporations.
>
> GET A CHAIN RESPONSE STARTED!  I can do only so much.  I can only post
> to so many newsgroups - I can't do it alone.  WE ALL NEED YOUR HELP!
>
> Copy this message and post it to (at least) 3 newsgroups where it does
> not appear! Then, Send this message by EMAIL to (at least) 5 friends!
> If everyone does that, we can FLOOD THE F.C.C. with comments and THEY
> WILL LISTEN!
>
> The major ccorporations and the politicians are coonducting this merger
> on their terms, for their benefit, and giving no thought whatsoever to
> the users. They are all fighting over our dollars, but do they give any
> concern whatsoever to us?  Does a fish ride a bicycle?
>
> They believe that the internet, which WE, not them, made great, is now
> too valuable to be left the users.  Their attitude is, "let them comment,
> they don't count, they are not rich corporations, they are merely poor
> users.  Will YOU let them get away with this?
>
> They can ignore 250 users.  They can't ignore thousands of users.
>
> LET THE F.C.C. know that THE INTERNET DOSEN'T STAND FOR ANY BULL! Tell
> the F.C.C. I'M MAD AS HELL AND I'M NOT GONNA TAKE IT ANYMORE!
>
> The future of USENET and IRC depends on the FCC forcing all ISP's
> starting with Time Warner and AOL to recognize free speech and fair
> marketing practices.  PLEASE HELP!
>
> TO FILE YOUR COMMENT WITH THE F.C.C:
>
> 1.  Copy the letter to a file.  You can put it on your letterhead
> with MS Word or just use a text file.  You can make any change to
> the letter you want, or add any comment you have.  CHANGES ARE GOOD!
> They show you READ THE LETTER and REALLY CARE!  If you had a bad
> experience with AOL or Time Warner PUT IT IN!
>
> 2.  go to:
>
> https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/websql/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.hts
>
> (This is the official FCC page where electronic filing of petitions
> is accomplished)
>
> 3.  Fill out Cover sheet
>
> Put your name, Address, Email address, and all other required
> information on the form.  (Remember this is an OFFICIAL FILING so
> the FCC requires this information.  It is not published unless you
> put it in the letter as well as the form)
>
> Proceeding is
>
>              00 - 30
>
> (Leave out the spaces, they are there to get by the spam filter.
> Put in the -)
>
> (this is VERY IMPORTANT, it is the case number of the AOL TIME
> WARNER APPLICATION for merger.  If you get it wrong, your comment
> WILL NOT BE FILED!)
>
> 4.  Send Cover Sheet.
>
> 5.  After you send the Cover Sheet, THEN select the filename of the
> letter you are sending, and send that.
>
> 6.  After you send the file, you will receive an official
> confirmation of the filing from the FCC.
>
> 7. You can TYPE a comment instead of sending this sample comment, but
> DON'T PASTE THE SAMPLE COMMENT into the Short Comment box - it
> DOESN'T FIT!
>
> Comment will appear for all to read in about 4 hours
> (but won't appear after business hours or on the weekend.)
>
> 8.  If you want to see your letter, or read the other submissions,
> other letters, the AOL petition, the Disney or Consumer's Union
> objections, etc, here is the URL - Its long!  Put in the case
> number, 00 - 30 (no spaces) and nothing else.
>
>
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?ws_mode=re
trieve_list&id_proceeding=00-30&start=1
>
> IF YOU LIVE N A FOREIGN COUNTRY and wish to make a comment (This is a
> world wide problem) the Cover Sheet will not accept your address.  You
> can do this:  Enter your real name and address including country in
> the address lines, but in the STATE box  put CA and in the ZIP (first
> field) put 90001.  Ignore the 2nd zip field.  Ignore the 2nd form, and
> TYPE your SHORT COMMENT in the 3rd form. Please identify the country
> you live in the message.  Don't use the sample letter supplied
> because it isn't appropriate for non-US residents.
>
> ***>Remember the FORM INFORMATION will NOT appear, only the letter.
>
> NOTE:  There is NO WORD WRAPPING on the letter below, to make it
> easy for you to format so it may be hard to read until you copy it,
> depending on your news reader.
>
>
>         SAMPLE MESSAGE
>
> ------------cut here----------------------------------------------
>
>
> To the FCC Commissioners
>
> Ladies and Gentlemen:
>
> I am writing in response to the proposed merger of America Time Warner
Communications. There are two elements in the proposal that greatly concern
me. I would hope that the commissioners would carefully consider these in
making their decisions.
>
> The development and evolution of the Internet is a study in how a system
without artificial limits can exceed anyone's expectations. The "rules of
the road" for the information superhighway, such as they are, have been
agreed upon by community consensus and is a marvelous example of market
forces at work. One of the guiding principles which has evolved within this
community is the open and free exchange of information, much as there is
within the academic environment that fostered the early years of the
Internet. The internet has always subscribed to and operated under the
guarantees of the First amendment to the Constitution, without regard for
questioning whether this was a legal requirement.
>
> The proposed merger as set forth in proceeding # 00-30 will violate every
principle of freedom of speech upon which the Internet has historically been
based. Specifically, the combination of Time Warner and AOL will be powerful
enough to establish the rules which everyone desiring high speed, and
possibly any, access will be subject to, and those rules are truly alarming
to those accustomed to freedom of the net.  They state:
>
> IF TIME WARNER DETERMINES THAT THE SUBSCRIBER HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH
THE SERVICE'S STANDARDS OF CONDUCT OR LIMITS ON BANDWIDTH UTILIZATION, TIME
WARNER MAY SUSPEND SUBSCRIBER'S ACCOUNT.  TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS SHALL
HAVE THE SOLE AND UNREVIEWABLE RIGHT TO DETERMINE WHETHER CONTENT VIOLATES
THESE STANDARDS.
>
> This language is quite frightening, given that it grants license to censor
to a corporate entity not to the common good, but to bottom line economic
forces. Our guarantees under the constitution were designed by its authors
to be beyond those forces for good reason. They recognized that such a
fundamental right to freedom could never be effectively overseen by a purely
commercial, or even political, entity. I believe that the Commissioners
would be well served to remember that example, and move to insure that
access cannot be denied to the internet by the gatekeeper based on the
content of the speech of the user.
>
> My second concern is related, although it could never have been foreseen
by our founding fathers.  Bandwidth is fundamental to the ability to
communicate on the Internet. Here again, Time Warner Communication proposes
to hold a noose around the available bandwidth, and, subject to their whim
alone, choke off access to those they deem unacceptable.
>
> Certainly this commission cannot order how much bandwidth they supply to
their customer.  But this commission can and should insure that any company,
as a condition of the privilege of merger, deliver to their customers what
they promise.  A company which advertises and sells unlimited access, then
terminates those who use this access, while retaining what, to them is the
most profitable base, those who do not use this access, is defrauding the
public.
>
> I urge you, therefore, to consider these concerns in reaching your
decision.  The easy course will be to merely accede to the demands of the
corporations.  That, however, will require that someone eventually solve the
problems that will inevitably result from that decision - and the person who
must repair the damage may be you.
>
> Thank you for your attention to my concerns.
>
> ----> YOUR NAME <----
> tcydwblvpoefcmotjxihrsfjswzfn
>