[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT

Subject: Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 06:59:52 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
References: <YFrM5.152$zs5.6406@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <Z5sM5.45$Kh4.5660@news0.optus.net.au> <3A025535.7BDA4E6B@attglobal.net> <6YsM5.116623$bI6.4488477@news1.giganews.com> <3a02cab5$0$28165$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:22453

"Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
3a02cab5$0$28165$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au">news:3a02cab5$0$28165$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "Dave Proctor"
> > "Bruce Greening"
> >
> > > With the Act finally winding up AN a few days ago, the land etc passed
to
> > the ACt Govt. RAC are negotiating to take over most of it from ACT.
Right
> now it
> > is a little vauge as to what law, rules etc apply.
> >
> > (Rubs hands gleefully)
> > Sounds like a lawyers paradise!
>
> Always got the meter on eh?

I am thinking purely from the professional viewpoint. Might ask one or two
people next time I see them.

Dave

References:
- Rail Safety Act in ACT
  - From: "keith malcolm" <kmalcolm@tpg.com.au>
- Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
  - From: Bruce Greening <bgreeni@attglobal.net>
- Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: 4638 running again
Next by Date: Re: Rail unions support Glenbrook inquiry recommendation
Prev by thread: Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
Next by thread: Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread