[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT

Subject: Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 06:30:28 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
References: <YFrM5.152$zs5.6406@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <Z5sM5.45$Kh4.5660@news0.optus.net.au> <3A025535.7BDA4E6B@attglobal.net>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:22401

"Bruce Greening" <bgreeni@attglobal.net> wrote in message
3A025535.7BDA4E6B@attglobal.net">news:3A025535.7BDA4E6B@attglobal.net...

> With the Act finally winding up AN a few days ago, the land etc passed to
the ACt
> Govt. RAC are negotiating to take over most of it from ACT. Right now it
is a
> little vauge as to what law, rules etc apply.

(Rubs hands gleefully)
Sounds like a lawyers paradise!

Dave

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>

References:
- Rail Safety Act in ACT
  - From: "keith malcolm" <kmalcolm@tpg.com.au>
- Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
  - From: Bruce Greening <bgreeni@attglobal.net>

Prev by Date: Re: If you can't beat grafitti, then go one better
Next by Date: Re: Off topic - Tempe Railway Station - any experts?
Prev by thread: Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
Next by thread: Re: Rail Safety Act in ACT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread