[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Airport Express - Is a Private Operator the Answer?

Subject: Re: Airport Express - Is a Private Operator the Answer?
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 00:16:44 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <392c79f3@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <392e132d$0$2645@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:10453

Andrew Tailby wrote:

> well you need the trailers

why?

> so may be bring down some 620 sets or get some
> new ones made.
> as with wolli creek theyshould have put a set of crossovers in so that
> menty that trains could termenate there but that would have been a good idea
> and we wouldnt want that.

What is wrong with travelling 2 minutes to Turrella to reverse?


--
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
------------------------------------
These comments are made in a private
capacity and do not represent the
official view of State Rail.
C.O.W.S. Page 11.

References:
- Re: Airport Express - Is a Private Operator the Answer?
  - From: "Andrew Tailby" <atailby@mpx.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Gunzel
Next by Date: Re: Why is it called "up"?
Prev by thread: Re: Airport Express - Is a Private Operator the Answer?
Next by thread: Re: Approach to Sydney Central
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread