Re: OT: Steam Engine Museum

[chris <chris@enet21.com.au>]

okay claim down ,but if the landholder wants it off and gives the Dorrigo a
reasonable amount of time to remove it and Dorrigo don't then legally the
landholder can do whatever he/she/they likes. I'm not saying it would happen,
but if it did the landholder would be protected under the law to do what I have
previously said

Chris.

Trevor Edmonds wrote:

> chris wrote...
>
> >Unless Dorrigo has had a manpower and cash increase, the last time I heard
> (about 1
> >month ago was that 6042 still sits on LVV land. (still owned by council?).
> Dorrigo
> >pay rent to the land owners where 6042 sits.  Another group could still
> legally
> >aquire 6042 by offering to remove the loco quickly from its present
> location and
> >paying the council what Dorrigo paid for it and then getting the council to
> refund
> >Dorrigos money. After all, Dorrigo have had more that enough time to remove
> this
> >loco.So if any groups have a spare 50 grand it can be yours.
>
> What a load of crap. Dorrigo owns 6042, and rents the land it is standing
> on. It cannot be legally acquired by another group offering to remove it.
> There is an agreement in place for the loco to stay where it is for the time
> being. It will eventually be moved to Dorrigo. BTW, forget about a value of
> $50,000. There have been offers of over 4 times that amount!
>
> Trevor