[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [NSW] Great Service City Rail
- Subject: Re: [NSW] Great Service City Rail
- From: Ben <sporologist@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 19:26:58 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: none at all - totally disorganised
- References: <390a1557@pink.one.net.au> <390AA41F.6CC81B6A@ozemail.com.au> <bemlgs0hbtl40r144ng32o5ainlhc9b2tu@4ax.com> <390adfd4$0$27499@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <8egud2$t3a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <390C2C66.F11695FE@ozemail.com.au> <390cdbd4$0$27513@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:7601
Sydney sprawls a lot less than brisbane and perth. The population
density is higher in sydney than in any other Australian city.
Hubert Lam wrote:
>
> All stations isn't a problem. It simplifies the network much more, but doesn't work well if we have
> urban sprawl like Sydney.
>
> "David Johnson" <trainman@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message news:390C2C66.F11695FE@ozemail.com.au...
> > "James C." wrote:
> >
> > > I think Transperth and Citytrain maybe close to "perfect", so far I
> > > rarely (actually never) saw any complaint from Citytrain or Transperth
> > > users.
> >
> > My complaint has always been that they stop all stations.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > David Johnson
> > trainman@ozemail.com.au
> > http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
> > ------------------------------------
> > These comments are made in a private
> > capacity and do not represent the
> > official view of State Rail.
> > C.O.W.S. Page 11.
> >
> >