[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Best Suburban/interurban train???
- Subject: Re: Best Suburban/interurban train???
- From: Rob Kearey <robk@powerup.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 17:24:07 +1000
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
- References: <390BD46E.68247CCC@enet21.com.au> <lASO4.4881$PL4.168847@ozemail.com.au> <390bf9a6$0$27517@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <q0TO4.442$Uy3.594496@news0.optus.net.au> <390BFCD0.A0127E6@ozemail.com.au> <8eh1t0$h6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <cfUO4.451$Uy3.632802@news0.optus.net.au> <8ehclo$ap7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <390C469B.8CC46099@ozemail.com.au>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:7504
David Johnson wrote:
> > Then you got to try IMU, as far as suburban/interurban trains are
> > concerned, IMU ride quality is the best I expereinced(been a newer
> > train then "V" also influence),
> Also influenced by the fact that it runs on the best aligned track in
> Australia. A V set on similar quality track would ride equally well.
The IMU has the same suspension setup as an SMU - which to my mind means
excessive rocking and rolling. The underfloor sound insulation is
better, however, so it's a lot less noisy.
The SMU2's have a completely different suspension, using coil springs
and dampers instead of rubber chevrons. Much better!
> > more comofortable seats then most of the
> > interurban trains
> I disagree there. The V set seats are far superior to those on the IMUs.
I'd disagrre, but horses for courses. I'm a short-arse.
> Choosing between V sets and IMUs, I feel the V sets would just win.
If the V sets underwent a major (IE: not pissweak citydecker style)
refit, I'd agree with you.
I believe the SMU2 slay's em all, personally. And they sound like a
qoole science fiction movie soundtrack!
> David Johnson
Rob K