Re: electric loco 4501 or 7001

[David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>]

David Bromage wrote:

> ROY HOWARTH (rhowarth@ihug.com.au) wrote:
> > Someone from the RTM may wish to clarify, but I understand they are
> > considering dropping 7100 from the list of exhibits as they now have two
> > 46-class locos under their wing - one static (4601 @ Valley Heights) and
> > one operational (4638 @ Delec).
>
> > This makes 7100 effectively superflous to their requirements as it isn't
> > considered a "major development" in technology, being only a test-bed.
>
> By that argument, 42220 should not be preserved.
>
> If Thirlmere doesn't want 7100, send it to Valley Heights for static
> preservation.

Send it to Dorrigo.



--
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
------------------------------------
These comments are made in a private
capacity and do not represent the
official view of State Rail.
C.O.W.S. Page 11.