Re: electric loco 4501 or 7001

[dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)]

ROY HOWARTH (rhowarth@ihug.com.au) wrote:
> Someone from the RTM may wish to clarify, but I understand they are 
> considering dropping 7100 from the list of exhibits as they now have two 
> 46-class locos under their wing - one static (4601 @ Valley Heights) and 
> one operational (4638 @ Delec). 

> This makes 7100 effectively superflous to their requirements as it isn't 
> considered a "major development" in technology, being only a test-bed.

By that argument, 42220 should not be preserved.

If Thirlmere doesn't want 7100, send it to Valley Heights for static
preservation.

Cheers
David