[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Vic] Metcard - What could be done.

Subject: Re: [Vic] Metcard - What could be done.
From: "Daniel Bowen" <dbowen@#DELETE#custard.net.au>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 12:45:58 +1000
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
References: <8F4E95C67telstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net> <ypc25.13$k_4.346033@news0.optus.net.au> <8F5527945telstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net> <quj25.174220$701.2273752@news4.giganews.com> <8ifc5t$80h$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:12527

"Anthony Morton" <amorton@mullian.ee.mu.oz.au> wrote in message
news:8ifc5t$80h$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU...
> >"Michael [remote]" <mk@netstra.com.au> wrote
> >Because they own the system, they are entitled to do with it whatever
they
> >wish.
>
> Time was when the people owned the public transport system.  I never gave
> consent to have it sold off.

Nor me... but I'd bet that if the trams had been privately owned when
MetCard was being designed, that today you would be able to buy a daily
ticket on a tram.


Daniel
--
Daniel Bowen, Melbourne, Australia
dbowen at custard dot net dot au
http://www.custard.net.au/bowen/daniel/

References:
- Re: [Vic] Metcard - What could be done.
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [Vic] Metcard - What could be done.
  - From: mk@netstra.com.au (Michael [remote])
- Re: [Vic] Metcard - What could be done.
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [Vic] Metcard - What could be done.
Next by Date: Re: [Melb] Safety fears block tram's return
Prev by thread: Re: [Vic] Metcard - What could be done.
Next by thread: Re: [Vic] Metcard - What could be done.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread