[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)

Subject: Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 06:39:43 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Another Optus Customer
References: <39458ed7@news.iprimus.com.au> <3945A197.1439FCE3@VICSIG.alphalink.com.au> <3945D296.6E9C50BA@netstra.com.au> <uyj15.4$UQ2.14568@news0.optus.net.au> <INj15.5$UQ2.27120@news0.optus.net.au> <8F52A48FCtelstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net> <Iwk15.8$UQ2.59067@news0.optus.net.au> <8F52A70EBtelstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:11988

"Michael Kurkowski" <mk@netstra.com.au> wrote in message
8F52A70EBtelstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net">news:8F52A70EBtelstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net...
> Dave Proctor <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au> said:
>
> >Sounds good to me. Those with servers with long retention periods can
> >set up a killfile entry for FAQ.
>
> Or I could be un-lazy and add a cancel message for last weeks post.

LOL. Is it possible to add a header stipulating retention time (since a lot
of servers don't honour cancels)?

Dave

References:
- Re: Is aus.rail bad?
  - From: Michael Kurkowski <mk@netstra.com.au>
- FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
  - From: Michael Kurkowski <mk@netstra.com.au>
- Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
  - From: Michael Kurkowski <mk@netstra.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: aus.rail is sh*t
Next by Date: Re: Going Home SBS TV - My First Watch
Prev by thread: Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
Next by thread: Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread