[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)

Subject: Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
From: Michael Kurkowski <mk@netstra.com.au>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 06:32:16 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Netstra Pty Ltd
References: <39458ed7@news.iprimus.com.au> <3945A197.1439FCE3@VICSIG.alphalink.com.au> <3945D296.6E9C50BA@netstra.com.au> <uyj15.4$UQ2.14568@news0.optus.net.au> <INj15.5$UQ2.27120@news0.optus.net.au> <8F52A48FCtelstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net> <3945d413$0$525$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
User-Agent: Xnews/2.04.09
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:11984

HXP1 <hxp1@dingoblue.net.au.gunzel> said:

>Michael Kurkowski <mk@netstra.com.au> wrote in message
>8F52A48FCtelstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net">news:8F52A48FCtelstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net...
>
>> (Sunday 0:00 sounds like a good posting time).
>
>Surely it could be at 04:12?

Take a look at the line count for the FAQ on alt.sysadmin.recovery (-:

Hmmm, though 04:12 sounds like an idea...

Michael

References:
- Re: Is aus.rail bad?
  - From: Michael Kurkowski <mk@netstra.com.au>
- FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
  - From: Michael Kurkowski <mk@netstra.com.au>
- Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
  - From: "HXP1" <hxp1@dingoblue.net.au.gunzel>

Prev by Date: Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
Next by Date: Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
Prev by thread: Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
Next by thread: Re: FAQ (was: Re: Is aus.rail bad?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread