[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class

Subject: Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
From: "Eric Cartman" <erkV69@erk.au.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2000 06:59:57 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: I have an organization? That is rather a personal question!
References: <3938ec83.504656@news.one.net.au> <jd3ijsc09m0v99qrimudi725n3qstt9gog@4ax.com> <3939b7d2$0$8458$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Reply-To: "Eric Cartman" <erkV69@erk.au.com>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:11447

ISTR that most of Adelaide's tram route is on dedicated rght of way while
the W's operate mostly in higher traffic (tram and road) traffic. Maybe that
is part of the difference.

--
Eric
aus.rail FAQ (under evaluation)
http://www.erk.au.com/erktrans/ausrail_faq.htm

Eric's Transport Site Direct URL: http://www.erk.au.com/erktrans/
Sport, TV and Humour Archives http://www.webalias.com/erknet
Email me: erkV69@erk.au.com (remove the V69)

The White Zone is for the immediate loading and unloading of passengers
only. There is no stopping in a Red Zone.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: "James C" <jamesccj@optusnet.com.au>
- Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: Chris Brownbill <cbrnbill@enternet.com.au>

References:
- [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: tram@ding.ding (W-Class)
- Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: billboltonREMOVE-TO-EMAIL@computer.org (Bill Bolton)
- Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
  - From: "John Wayman" <trecker@optusnet.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Whats your fav loco?
Next by Date: Re: It wasn't me
Prev by thread: Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
Next by thread: Re: [melb]Swanston don't want W-Class
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread