[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SA]-[VIC] 2000 class railcars

Subject: Re: [SA]-[VIC] 2000 class railcars
From: "Chris Drymalik" <drymalik@arcom.com.au>
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 18:17:18 +0930
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <8jghk8$od9$1@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au> <395BEBFA.EE52FEE5@yahoo.com> <395cae79$1_2@news.chariot.net.au> <3963cfa5@kastagir.senet.com.au> <HAQ85.14$IE4.405729@news0.optus.net.au> <39655610@kastagir.senet.com.au> <cXc95.18$Oz4.299797@news0.optus.net.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:13966

"David Bromage" <dbromage@fang.omni.com.au> wrote in message
cXc95.18$Oz4.299797@news0.optus.net.au">news:cXc95.18$Oz4.299797@news0.optus.net.au...
> Chris Drymalik (drymalik@arcom.com.au) wrote:
> > > Because the other part of the cab used to carry the guard.
> > >
> > I know that - but it strikes me that the guard should not be locked away
> > from the rest of the train. He should be able to see the full length of
the
> > car, like the guards compartment in the 3000 class.
>
> What about the other 5 cars in the train?
That's what windows in the connecting doors are for. Also if the guard locks
himself away, why have him?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SA]-[VIC] 2000 class railcars
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)

References:
- Re: [SA]-[VIC] 2000 class railcars
  - From: "Chris Drymalik" <drymalik@arcom.com.au>
- Re: [SA]-[VIC] 2000 class railcars
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: [SA]-[VIC] 2000 class railcars
  - From: "Chris Drymalik" <drymalik@arcom.com.au>
- Re: [SA]-[VIC] 2000 class railcars
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)

Prev by Date: Re: Mechanical signalling
Next by Date: Re: $99 one-way airfares : Who needs the XPT
Prev by thread: Re: [SA]-[VIC] 2000 class railcars
Next by thread: Re: [SA]-[VIC] 2000 class railcars
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread