Re: Deary deary me ...

["canetram59" <canetram59@hotmail.com>]

The photo showing the 106db reading on the sound meter is misleading. The
locos are passing directly under the device and this would give a higher
reading due to the location and proximity of the sound meter. What were the
sound readings either side of the train and at various distances away from
the train (including outside those obnoxious graffitti panels - sorry, noise
abatement panels).
The photos in the so called Rogue's Gallery appear to be rather mild
compared to other non-railway civil construction sites that I have seen.

canetram59

James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
387C2CBD.579ECE6E@ozemail.com.au">news:387C2CBD.579ECE6E@ozemail.com.au...
> The site design is terrible, the audio files are poor quality and the
> photos really suck! lol :-)
>
> http://www.rag.org.au/rag/train001.jpg
>
> You can barely see the train in this one! <g!>
>
> Rob Kearey wrote:
>
> > People living next to railway lines discover that trains make noise.
> >
> > Well, duh.
> >
> > I hope they're enjoying the lovely view of the vandalized noise
> > abatement panels.
> >
> > http://www.rag.org.au/frag/
>
>
>
> --
> - James Brook -
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> e-mail:
> mailto:ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au
> Victorian Railfan Web Site:
> http://www.railpage.org.au/vr/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>