[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SA] Renmark
- Subject: Re: [SA] Renmark
- From: Chris Gordon <cmgord@VICSIG.alphalink.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:21:49 +1100
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: VICSIG
- References: <9006D6A85gunzelT333@203.164.20.149> <3A337F38.3184@ozemail.com.au> <9113i6$3be$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3a3424cd.9223528@can-news.tpg.com.au>
- Reply-To: remove VICSIG <>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:26488
> >An oddity maybe, but certainly not unique. Without any reference
> >material at hand, I would suggest that there were combined rail/road
> >bridges at Renmark, Echuca and Tocumwal (probably Robinvale too -
> >can't remember). There are rail-only bridges at Murray Bridge,
> >Yarrawonga and Albury/Wodonga, so the score (on Murray River bridges) is
> >about even.
Well Echuca bridge had a new railway one built (road still using the old
one, but that is up for replacement too now), and Tocumwal got a new
road bridge (rail still using the old one), unlike Renmark trains still
cross the Murray at Echuca and Tocumwal almost daily.
--
C.
WEB : www railpage org au / vicsig
EMAIL : cmgord at alphalink dot com dot au
ICQ : three two nine eight nine four five zero
Go join VRN : www egroups com / subscribe / vicrail-news