[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AD - NSW New V Set Pics on my website
- Subject: Re: AD - NSW New V Set Pics on my website
- From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 03:14:54 GMT
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
- References: <3a239488$1@news.iprimus.com.au> <3A265E07.44B8BE83@ozemail.com.au> <hRAV5.28321$IP1.844051@news1.giganews.com> <3A2853EC.E9934F18@ozemail.com.au>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:25954
"David Johnson" <trainman@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
3A2853EC.E9934F18@ozemail.com.au">news:3A2853EC.E9934F18@ozemail.com.au...
> Dave Proctor wrote:
>
> > "David Johnson" <trainman@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
> > news:3A265E07.44B8BE83@ozemail.com.au...
> > >
> > > Originally built commencing from 1970 in conjunction with the
extension of
> > > electrification to Gosford, the double decked interurban sets (some of
the
> > > early carriages had non-vacuum
> > > brakes so were known originally as U sets to identify them as
> > > different from the later vacuum braked trains - hence the name V set)
> > >
> > > ?????????
> >
> > Agreed - he has got it arse-about. The original DDIU's were targetted U,
> > since U was the designator for IU trains (no mucking about with
different
> > designators for different types back then - U for both DDIU and SDIU).
It is
> > the "V" sets that were targetted differently to distinguish them.
>
> But it had nothing to do with the brakes. The vacuum infered to was to do
with
> the loos.
Did not see that bit (read it when tired).
Dave