[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [NSW] Cityrail on Backberner

Subject: Re: [NSW] Cityrail on Backberner
From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael Kurkowski)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:43:46 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Alphabetical.
References: <399BD68F.7671834F@ozemail.com.au> <3NRm5.11191$I43.38027@news1.eburwd1.vic.optushome.com.au> <399BFDE2.D168C05B@ozemail.com.au> <X5%m5.46$1V.5566@news0.optus.net.au>
User-Agent: Xnews/03.04.11
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:16348

dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage) wrote in 
<X5%m5.46$1V.5566@news0.optus.net.au>:

>CityRail has no contingency plans for things running properly. They've
>already ordered the buses.

Don't you think you're contradicting yourself? Assuming what you said above 
is correct, buses ARE the contingency plan for if things go wrong.

MK

-- 
Michael Kurkowski [email: michael DOT kurkowski AT gunzel DOT net]

http://www.gunzel.net
ICQ: 1459118

etc etc etc. apathy prevents me from writing this quote.

References:
- [NSW] Cityrail on Backberner
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [NSW] Cityrail on Backberner
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [NSW] Cityrail on Backberner
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)

Prev by Date: Re: Auran Trainz - forthcoming Train Sim
Next by Date: Re: [Vic] Zs on 86?
Prev by thread: Re: [NSW] Cityrail on Backberner
Next by thread: Re: [NSW] Cityrail on Backberner
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread