[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Minister says train crash could have been avoided

Subject: Re: Minister says train crash could have been avoided
From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:59:10 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <Grpm5.54$QQ6.8371@news0.optus.net.au> <gyHm5.23$E63.3361@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:16231

David Martin <d_martin@mountains.net.au> wrote in message
gyHm5.23$E63.3361@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net">news:gyHm5.23$E63.3361@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net...
> Stating the obvious, isn't it?
> What collision couldn't be avoided?
>


The ones that weren't?

References:
- Minister says train crash could have been avoided
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Minister says train crash could have been avoided
  - From: "David Martin" <d_martin@mountains.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [VIC] Huge errors in Newsrail
Next by Date: Re: Sydney Rail - It's the pits according to the NY Times
Prev by thread: Re: Minister says train crash could have been avoided
Next by thread: Wollongong NSW
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread