[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [NSW] Cityrail Grades

Subject: Re: [NSW] Cityrail Grades
From: alberta@zip.com.au (Albert Alcoceba)
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 02:05:44 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Insert smart-ass comment about messy deks here
References: <eHXI4.3860$5D.8074@ozemail.com.au> <phYI4.3882$5D.7926@ozemail.com.au> <38f45fb8$0$11897@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <38F46240.8F87432E@ozemail.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:7374

On Wed, 12 Apr 2000 21:47:12 +1000, Anita Lukaszyk
<neety@ozemail.com.au> wrote:

>I *think* it uses 'feet' instead of metres.

Makes absolutely no difference wether you use feet, inches,
millimetres or cubits :)


Albert Alcoceba
  <><
alberta@zip.com.au
http://homepages.tig.com.au/~alberta

References:
- [NSW] Cityrail Grades
  - From: "Mitch" <this.is.not.my@address.postoffice.net>
- Re: [NSW] Cityrail Grades
  - From: "Chris Downs" <cvdowns@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [NSW] Cityrail Grades
  - From: "Hubert Lam" <hubert@imap4.com>
- Re: [NSW] Cityrail Grades
  - From: Anita Lukaszyk <neety@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Questions, Answers and Tips
Next by Date: Re: Cityracket ticket inspectors
Prev by thread: Re: [NSW] Cityrail Grades
Next by thread: Re: [NSW] Cityrail Grades
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread