Re: 9137? (Waurn Ponds - Cowangie goods?)

[Craig Haber <albatross@harnessnet.com.au>]

Aus loco discussion mailing list

hi,

Steven Hurst wrote:

>     Just to clarify, the loco I saw was definately X32 (photos), and it was
> halfway to ballarat at about 15:30, so what loco was it you saw?

I checked with FA today, and it was in fact X42 on the Ponderosa in question.
Ahhh this business has cost me my mind, now it's attacking my eyesight.....I
could have sworn it was 32...I had 32 written down on my notepad.  Perhaps my
mother was right all those years ago "Stop it or you'll go blind!".  No, this
business has not yet cost my sense of humour :)

I was right about one thing though - there were two 9137's - as the loading did
not have to connect, the Waurn Ponds became 9137A, not sure if the 'other' 9137
is just 9137 or 9137B though.

My apologies to those whom I questioned!

Today's Ponderosa was X33+T396 on the down, with X33 solo on the up.  Loco's
stabled at Geelong at 1545 hours included S301, G513, X54, G523, X40, T379, X47,
and at Nth Yard were Y174, G512, and an X+X+S at Nth 'C' box.

Cheers,
Craig.
--
Craig Haber
albatross@harnessnet.com.au
http://www.harnessnet.com.au/ch/
Proofread carefully to see if you any words out


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to Ausloco-unsubscribe@listbot.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Advertisement:
redtag.com offers UNBELIEVABLE prices on a wide variety of brand
names. Get a boys or girls MURRAY 20" bike for only $29.99! Compare
as high as $99. To receive 10% off any purchase TODAY go to
http://www.lisbot.com/links/redtag2