[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: movable-span bridges

Subject: Re: movable-span bridges
From: "Derick Wuen" <cullend@webone.com.au>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 23:30:33 +1000
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: misc.transport.rail.australia-nz,aus.rail
Organization: Web One Internet http://webone.com.au
References: <01bf0304$a2137580$cb8817d2@rodsmith> <37E611E3.F4498199@melbpc.org.au>


John Duncan McCallum wrote in message <37E611E3.F4498199@melbpc.org.au>...

snip

>The Causeway as used by the Perth trams had three sections, two were low
>level and the third, at the Victoria Park end, had a raised section for
>river traffic. It was replaced by the present Causeway with two sections
>in the early 50s after the trams had ceased.
>
>John McCallym

Was the "raised section" a movable span?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: movable-span bridges
  - From: John Duncan McCallum <mccallum@melbpc.org.au>

References:
- movable-span bridges
  - From: "Roderick Smith" <rodsmith@werple.net.au>
- Re: movable-span bridges
  - From: John Duncan McCallum <mccallum@melbpc.org.au>

Prev by Date: SCT-Bathurst
Next by Date: Re: Victorian election
Prev by thread: Re: movable-span bridges
Next by thread: Re: movable-span bridges
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread