[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Atomic Train
- Subject: Re: Atomic Train
- From: dave pierson <pierson@mail.dec.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 17:57:22 -0400
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: SMART Modular Technolgies
- References: <37b8ed21.26186925@news.ozemail.com.au> <7p9atp$7no$1@centipede.wantree.com.au> <7p9b8h$83o$1@centipede.wantree.com.au> <37B8925D.431DD239@hotmail.com> <7pa6mg$m2n$1@metro.ucc.usyd.edu.au> <37B8A616.53D0@hotmail.com> <__1u3.491$ei1.1208@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <37B8ADDE.4F8425BA@melbpc.org.au> <7pabsi$68g17@atbhp.corpmel.bhp.com.au> <Eqtu3.1449$ei1.2640@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <37c185cc.2394454@news.bigpond.com>
Bill Bolton wrote:
> "Ron BESDANSKY (formerly Ron BEST)" <ronbest@bigpond.com> wrote:
> > From a technical accuracy point of view, this was the best train movie I've
> > seen. I couldn't fault it.
Humbly disagree.
For Starters, there is no provision on boxcars for clambering
bravely along the side to save the world...
> Lucky you!
> The N'Yawkers over in misc.transport.urban-transit came up with a long
> list of faults... which just goes to illustrate if you don't know the
> places, a lot of the stuff the local congiscenti pick up on is quite
> oblivious to other viewers, even if they know the general field well.
I forget the rest of the list, but it was nontrivial...
best
dave p