[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Olympic Sprint Platform - Lidcombe
- Subject: Re: Olympic Sprint Platform - Lidcombe
- From: keithm@commslab.gov.au (Keith Malcolm)
- Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 09:20:23 GMT
- Newsgroups: aus.rail, misc.transport.rail.australia-nz
- Organization: Dept of Communications LAB
- References: <WqYT2.263$zn1.2823@nswpull.telstra.net> <7fuvja$dge$1@lios.apana.org.au> <3728aabb.5903813@news.ozemail.com.au> <jYtV2.21364$MB3.29253@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <7g6od2$5cf$1@news.mel.aone.net.au> <7gcbre$3hh$1@lios.apana.org.au> <7gdcu2$ikj$2@n
In article <7gtn5e$9k6$1@news.mel.aone.net.au> "David Proctor" <daproc@spam_this.umpires.com> writes:
>From: "David Proctor" <daproc@spam_this.umpires.com>
>Subject: Re: Olympic Sprint Platform - Lidcombe
>Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 13:41:25 +1000
>Ron BEST wrote in message ...
>>can someone pls tell me whether trailing crossovers used regularly for
>>turning trains back have one or both sets of trailing points fitted with
>>FPLs? If not, doesn't this contradict the rule about FPLs having to be
>>fitted to ALL points used by passenger trains in the facing direction?
>This rule seems to have fallen by the wayside - looking at the junction at
>Harris Park, none of the points appear to have FPL's - or at least, not the
>type we have gotten used to, although there IS a lot of rodding outside the
>tracks.
>DaveP
The safeworking rules still contain the clause about clipping and locking with
an SL lock on facing points for trains carrying passengers if a FPL isn't
fitted.
Dave Malcolm