Re: Very important table-tennis rule(interpretation) changes

Subject: Re: Very important table-tennis rule(interpretation) changes
From: Ann Bishop <annieb@zipworld.com.au>
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 00:17:31 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.comms.mobile, aus.politics, aus.tv, aus.sf, aus.rail
Organization: very little
References: <199905042111.XAA26841@mail.replay.com> <pro-0505991508160001@d053.meldas4.access.net.au> <7gokrc$8mj$2@news.mel.aone.net.au>
Reply-To: annieb@zipworld.com.au
Xref: netgate.bta.bt.com aus.comms.mobile:7125 aus.politics:46245 aus.tv:18507 aus.sf:1325 aus.rail:11217

David Proctor wrote:
> 
> Ummmm - why was this in aus.rail?
> 
> DaveP
> 
I don't know,probably for the same reason it was in aus.tv.
annieb

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Very important table-tennis rule(interpretation) changes
  - From: jmcguire <jmcguire@highway1.com.au>

References:
- Re: Very important table-tennis rule(interpretation) changes
  - From: pro@survey.freehosting.net (daniel)
- Re: Very important table-tennis rule(interpretation) changes
  - From: "David Proctor" <daproc@sd4.mailbank.com>