[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Melbourne Trams
- Subject: Re: Melbourne Trams
- From: Daniel Bowen <dfbowen@my-dejanews.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 22:40:44 +1000
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Custard Communications Pty Ltd
- References: <374BC18C.8E4D9C7E@ancc.com.au> <374DD9F2.6DD51EA1@melbpc.org.au> <3752b79e.0@news.highway1.com.au>
- Reply-To: dbowen@custard.SPAMTRAP.net.au
David Winter wrote:
> In fact the main culprits in Melbourne are the local councils who refuse to
> allow an adequate passing lane on the approach and departure sides of tram
> stops, so that traffic can get around stationary trams. To improve traffic
Get around stationary trams? Why would you want to do that? The whole
point of the law is that you have to wait for a stationary tram.
> flow, I'd suggest legalising passing on the right - simple in many
> locations.
Simple and bloody dangerous. If you don't want to get delayed by trams
in your car, you find a road with no trams.
Daniel
--
Daniel Bowen, Custard Communications Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
----------
E-mail: dfbowen @ ozemail.net.au ---- dbowen @ custard.net.au
---------------
Send a stupid e-card! http://www.toxiccustard.com/cards/