[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ODD SIGNS

Subject: Re: ODD SIGNS
From: keithm@happy.dca.gov.au (Dave Malcolm)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 06:54:32 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Dept of Transport & Communications LAB
References: <S7ic3.15144$PN5.38918@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <01bebe2b$58b9df00$5e2e11cb@rodsmith> <3772E3AD.D13A8F22@omni.com.au> <3773F7EB.4B@REMOVEiprolink.co.nz> <01bec436$669d1040$552d11cb@rodsmith> <01bec6d8$e092b860$552e11cb@rodsmith> <01bec831$00dd2c

In article <3793E772.B144D479@omni.com.au> David Bromage <dbromage@omni.com.au> writes:
>Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 14:06:00 +1100
>From: David Bromage <dbromage@omni.com.au>
>Subject: Re: ODD SIGNS

>"Ron BESDANSKY (formerly Ron BEST)" wrote:
>> 
>> One that amuses me by not telling the full story is "Light out indicates
>> train approaching". It should be followed by "or the lamp's blown"!

>That's a failsafe mechanism. Think what would happen if a light on indicated
>a train approaching and the lamp was blown.

>Cheers
>David

A better way would be bright light indicates train approaching, dull light no 
train.

Dave Malcolm

References:
- Re: ODD SIGNS
  - From: "Roderick Smith" <rodsmith@werple.net.au>
- Re: ODD SIGNS
  - From: "Roderick Smith" <rodsmith@werple.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: C Class Rumours
Next by Date: Re: Airport Link Ticketing Machine
Prev by thread: Re: ODD SIGNS
Next by thread: Re: ODD SIGNS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread