[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Road and Rail Funding



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Behold, on Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:17:21 +1200 in
misc.transport.rail.australia-nz:<3777F471.51FD@REMOVEiprolink.co.nz>, David
McLoughlin (davemcl@REMOVEiprolink.co.nz) didst uttereth:

>Patrick Dunford wrote:
>
>> Trains have to go on railway lines. The construction costs of these lines
are
>> massive. Therefore I am definitely challenging the implication that it is
>> cheaper to run a train. When was the last time a new railway line was
built
>> in NZ? Tranz Rail will not do it unless they can be sure of getting enough
>> traffic. Just being able to compete over a route is not necessarily
enough.
>>
>> Most of the network that exists today was built by the State (as public
>> works, etc) and was not compelled to operate profitably. OK so the roads
at
>> present are not compelled to operate profitably either but at least it is
>> possible to show that the running costs of a railway are not trivial.
>
>Ahem I was talking about public transport -- trams and trains -- in
>cities. The cost of building a tram line or an electric train line 
snip

what sort of "electric train line" is this?

- -- 
Patrick Dunford, Christchurch, NZ
http://patrick.dunford.com/ 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.0.2i

iQA/AwUBN3vEnZ/ufSMMVdBMEQKh0QCgnShw8wbpcWXT1Fe5sMCsmU2xz9wAmwfn
bZxm7aaIX046FRbe8LUlx5Du
=+ieB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----