Re: Railway Digest posting.

[mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly)]

In article <2750ac20.3681bb66@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com> Arthur Daley <arthur_daleyNOarSPAM@excite.com.invalid> writes:
>From: Arthur Daley <arthur_daleyNOarSPAM@excite.com.invalid>
>Subject: Re: Railway Digest posting.
>Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 15:51:14 -0800

>If the postal system gets any worse, Digest will show up with covers
>more old fashion than the year 2000 spectacular pland for AMRM.

>Holy Smoke
>Arthur


>* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
>The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!


When people finally do get their Digest , I recommend reading the letters to 
the Editor section , particularily the one from the Right Honourable J 
Anderson MP , about what the Federal Govts policy to Rail is.
Without commenting on the substance of the letter,(there isnt much to comment 
on) its worth noting that the Feds have still not made any response to the 3 
outstanding inquiries into rail,the PC inquiry was tabled on the 5th August.
Its also worth noting that the WA Transport Minister has totally ruled out 
handing over the WA section of the SG Network to ARTC.
So much for the one stop shop policy.
After the AP to darwin line is built , if ever, National operators will have 
no less than 5 track access regimes and 6 State Rail Safety Acts to deal with.
Marvelous isnt it.


MD