[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SMH - Firm's worst nightmare: rail chiefs don't want its sleepers

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: SMH - Firm's worst nightmare: rail chiefs don't want its sleepers
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 22:26:19 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <6k6ipr$2d1$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <1998052405273500.BAA29629@ladder01.news.aol.com>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au

MarkBau1 wrote:

> <<<<<Then why is RSA renewing wood for steel sleepers in the down main south of
> Picton??>>>>>>
>
> Steel sleepers??? I thought railroads gave up on steel sleepers years ago?

You tell us.  You would know more about railroads than most Australians.  As for
railways, we still use steel sleepers on some lines, even on track circuited lines.

--
David Johnson
CityRail Guard
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SMH - Firm's worst nightmare: rail chiefs don't want its sleepers
  - From: dbromage@metz.une.edu.au (David Bromage)

References:
- Re: SMH - Firm's worst nightmare: rail chiefs don't want its sleepers
  - From: Ben_Armstong@my-dejanews.com
- Re: SMH - Firm's worst nightmare: rail chiefs don't want its sleepers
  - From: markbau1@aol.com (MarkBau1)

Prev by Date: RTM Website
Next by Date: Re: Clyde Open Day
Prev by thread: Re: SMH - Firm's worst nightmare: rail chiefs don't want its sleepers
Next by thread: Re: SMH - Firm's worst nightmare: rail chiefs don't want its sleepers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread