[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Failed Windscreen Test

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: Failed Windscreen Test
From: keithm@happy.dca.gov.au (Keith Malcolm)
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 08:39:29 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Dept of Transport & Communications LAB
References: <01bd26b4$c4b35de0$704c0acb@davibenn.pcug.org.au> <34C74A5F.61EC2103@ozemail.com.au>

In article <34C74A5F.61EC2103@ozemail.com.au> David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au> writes:
>From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
>Subject: Re: Failed Windscreen Test
>Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 00:32:15 +1100


>The Exploder/Endanger windscreens are designed to withstand a house brick at 160
>km/h.  The glass is 55mm thick.

>--
>David Johnson
>CityRail Guard
>trainman@ozemail.com.au
>http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/

What? 2" thick.

David Malcolm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Failed Windscreen Test
  - From: Eben Levy <ebenlevy@klever.net.au>

References:
- Failed Windscreen Test
  - From: "David Bennetts" <davibenn@pcug.org.au>
- Re: Failed Windscreen Test
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: End of the Sand Train?
Next by Date: Re: Pronunciation of Station Names
Prev by thread: Re: Failed Windscreen Test
Next by thread: Re: Failed Windscreen Test
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread