Re: Splitting distants: more than you wanted to know

John McCallum (mccallum@melbpc.org.au)
Fri, 06 Feb 1998 11:54:32 GMT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: John McCallum: "Re: Pronunciation - some more enquiries"
Previous message: John McCallum: "Re: Trip to Melbourne"
Maybe in reply to: Geoff Lambert: "Splitting distants: more than you wanted to know"
Next in thread: MarkBau1: "Re: Splitting distants: more than you wanted to know"

In article <6bb3bj$4lr$1@mirv.unsw.edu.au>, G.Lambert@unsw.edu.au (Geoff Lambert) wrote:

text removed to save bandwidth.

I suppose this is being pedantic, but converging distant signals are not
really splitting distants, as "Splitting Distants" infers a facing junction
ahead, not a trailing one.

Agreed?

John McCallum

Next message: John McCallum: "Re: Pronunciation - some more enquiries"
Previous message: John McCallum: "Re: Trip to Melbourne"
Maybe in reply to: Geoff Lambert: "Splitting distants: more than you wanted to know"
Next in thread: MarkBau1: "Re: Splitting distants: more than you wanted to know"