[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SIGNAL DESIGNATIONS

Subject: Re: SIGNAL DESIGNATIONS
From: "Ron BEST" <ronbest@bigpond.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 16:56:02 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <366b6901.0@139.134.5.33> <74fqf7$t0g$1@news.mel.aone.net.au>

Not the one I'm thinking of. This is a currently-working line. The sugnal
designations are distance-related, but not in the usual way.

David Bromage wrote in message <74fqf7$t0g$1@news.mel.aone.net.au>...
>Ron BEST (ronbest@bigpond.com) wrote:
>>  NSW STILL identify fully-automatic signals by their distance in MILES
>> and CHAINS from Sydney! There is at least one curious exception, on a
line
>> close to the city. Anyone know what I mean??
>
>NSR?
>
>Cheers
>David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SIGNAL DESIGNATIONS
  - From: David Bradshaw <alkdrmc@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: SIGNAL DESIGNATIONS
  - From: dbromage@omni.com.au (David Bromage)

References:
- SIGNAL DESIGNATIONS
  - From: "Ron BEST" <ronbest@bigpond.com>
- Re: SIGNAL DESIGNATIONS
  - From: dbromage@omni.com.au (David Bromage)

Prev by Date: Re: SIGNAL DESIGNATIONS
Next by Date: Re: Lazy gunzel wants to photograph trains from hotel room
Prev by thread: Re: SIGNAL DESIGNATIONS
Next by thread: Re: SIGNAL DESIGNATIONS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread