>you are wrong, people try and create a valid argument toward you, and
>then you reply with headers like "blahblah the idiot scab" and resort to
>language.
I have no problem with valid arguments, but I have yet to see one from
eebenn. Yes, I think I may have instigated "scab" after a couple of posters
had a go at Unions etc. This was not eben the idiot boy though. The language
is only responding in kind.
>> > he sends pornographic material to a minor.
>> FACT: If someone sends me spam or unsolicted abusive e-mail they
>> automatically get a disgusting photo in return.
>I replied to one of your posts, this can be seen here on aus.rail, no
>abuse, no spam. You sent me a pornographic photo in return. *sigh*
Another liar. Here's the header of the e-mail you sent you
----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kurkowski <#NOSPAM#simcard@tig.com.au>
Newsgroups: aus.rail
To: tezza@atinet.com.au <tezza@atinet.com.au>
Date: Wednesday, 22 April 1998 15:48
Subject: Re: Responses to Postings
>Apologies to those who are sick of this ever growing thread.
If you were at all apologetic you wouldn't continue with it.
>it looks like your ISP has to be contacted regarding this one.
Fortunately I have an ISP who doesn't like whingeing bitches like you and
proctor trying to enforce your censorship views onto others. If it was up to
you two the net would never have got going.