Re: 3830/3801 Questions

Eben Levy (ebenlevy@klever.net.au)
Mon, 20 Apr 1998 19:53:33 +1000

rdulin@hotmail.com wrote:

> Eben wrote:
> >Well, if you where n this trip, it should've been obvious to you.
>
> Alas, it wasn't. That's why I was asking :)
>
> >This is the hose they would've used. the reason they use this is that
> >the cost of upgrading the watering facilities would be to much. The
> >also use this time to let the passengers go and visit robertson, that's
> >what part of the trip was designed for.
>
> Visiting Robertson is what the trip's designed for... but it's a *long*
> walk from Picton (where the train was being rewatered, as I stated in the
> original post) to Robertson.

Sorry, I missed read the post, my apologies. But the same still applies but
as I haven't been to Picton while they a rewatering, it might well have been
a garden hose. 3801ltd don't normally rewater at Picton and therefore why
would they need to upgrade the watering facilities there?

>
>
> >[of 3830 & 3801 in either direction] Still looks good though.
> Absolutely,
>
> And thanks for the answers, everyone!
>
> Richie
>
> -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading

--
Bye for now,
Eben.

http://www.klever.net.au/~ebenlevy/