John McCallum wrote:
> I agree on the preference for the NSW (and SAR) classification system, although NSWGR did muck it up
> with the 421, 422 and 442 classes.
Although I'm a Victorian and hence think our system is the best (!),
what I did (and do) like about the NSW way of doing it is that the class
number is always seperate from the unit number. e.g., you have a 42201,
and a 42220, wheras in South Australia, you had 930 to 966, I'd have
preferred if this was done the NSW way 93001 to 93036.
Just my thoughts anyway....
Cheers,
Craig.
-- Craig Haber albatross@harnessnet.com.au Manufacturing Systems Engineer (almost) Web Page Designer, Harness Racing, Railways, and Essendon Football Club fanatic http://www.harnessnet.com.au/