Re: Overhead wires for LRT [wasOld Timer on Sydney Light Rail

dave pierson (pierson@gone.enet.dec.com)
21 JUL 97 20:04:04

In article <5r23kr$d8k_010@melbpc.org.au>, mccallum@melbpc.org.au (John McCallum) writes...
>In article <5qtjer$5fa$1@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>,
> pierson@gone.enet.dec.com (dave pierson) wrote:
Actually, i didn't. Nothing by me remains, but:

>>In article <33C76D81.270ED190@progsoc.uts.edu.au>, Cam
>><"cam[NoSpam]"@progsoc.uts.edu.au> writes...

>>>> Yes the overhead [for the new Sydney Australia LRT line] does appear
>>>> to be for normal pantograph operation,
>>>> > however what is different is that; double contact wire has been hung.
>>>> I would be interested to know why this is done, too. The new tramway
>>>> system at Sheffield UK uses this kind of double-contact wire, as do some
>>>> of the new French tramway systems, ie Rouen. The contact wire used seems
>>>> thicker than the single wire used on most tramway systems.

>There is another reason for using twin contact wire. Using two wires
>effectively doubles the conducting area, thus reducing voltage drop under
>heavy current. Therefore, the use of twin contact wires in Sydney may be more
>to do with using only one substation rather than two, which might otherwise be
>required.

Yup. Added feeders can be provided, crossbonded as needbe, both
positive and return. However adding a second CONTACT wire, adds
complexity, mass and expense to the OHL. Simple feeders will do as well
to add contact area. Dual contact wires add dual contact...

thanks
dave pierson |the facts, as accurately as i can manage,
Digital Equipment Corporation |the opinions, my own.
334 South St |
Shrewbury, Mass USA pierson@gone.enet.dec.com
"He has read everything, and, to his credit, written nothing." A J Raffles