[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RTM and steam? In the same sentence?
- Subject: Re: RTM and steam? In the same sentence?
- From: "Neil O'Connor" <neil_oconnor@nospam.acslink.net.au>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 07:41:57 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services
- References: <3aada5e6@occy.pnc.com.au> <3AADA71B.CE82DBD4@fang.omni.com.au> <3aae9426.1099502@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <3AAF30BF.15CABA21@zip.com.au>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:33905
Whats the status of 5910, 3642 and 3001?
Neil.
Roy Marshall wrote:
> You conveniently ignore 3801,3830 and 5367. 3265 is currently under
> restoration at Eveleigh and I believe 3237 will be back in service
> before too long. Not as good as Victoria I agree but the costs, eg.
> access charges, are far higher in NSW and make it a lot tougher to run
> trains. Hence the economics of running steam due to high fares needed to
> cover costs are not there.Basically it is getting too hard to get bums
> on seats at the fares you have to charge in NSW!!
>
> Cheers Roy
>
> Brown Family wrote:
> >
>
> > >Meanwhile, Victoria is working towards its 5th operational R class.
> > >
> > Ho-hum, as usual, Victoria has to show our northern cousins how things
> > are done.
> >
> > Try to get your act together you northern bums, otherwise the only
> > steam loco you will ever see Sydney will be an R-class on standard
> > guage.
> >
> > The number of steam locos you have rusting away at Dorrigo almost
> > brings me to tears. What a waste. What a shame that Sydney enthusiasts
> > seem to spend more time bitching and sniping at each other than
> > preserving such precious assets fast rotting away in the humidity in
> > Dorrigo.
> >
> > Les Brown