[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: National guage standardisation - why 4'8.5"?

Subject: Re: National guage standardisation - why 4'8.5"?
From: "michael pascoe" <michael_pascoe@iprimus.com.au>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:59:40 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: CWO Customer - reports relating to abuse should be sent to abuse@cwo.net.au
References: <01c0c661$c2afc380$dc2365cb@default> <908679A88gunzelT333@203.50.2.80>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:35193

Maybe rolling stock was easier to convert to STD Guage as well ?
Going from broad to narrow may not have been possible, and visa-versa.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: National guage standardisation - why 4'8.5"?
  - From: Peter Homann <"peter.homann"@@prr.org.au>

References:
- National guage standardisation - why 4'8.5"?
  - From: "Bradley Torr" <truenorth@one.net.au.SPAMTRAP>
- Re: National guage standardisation - why 4'8.5"?
  - From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)

Prev by Date: Re: National guage standardisation - why 4'8.5"?
Next by Date: Re: [nsw]Work experience with trains
Prev by thread: Re: National guage standardisation - why 4'8.5"?
Next by thread: Re: National guage standardisation - why 4'8.5"?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread