[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FA News
Railway Rasputin3 <james_ccj@my-deja.com> wrote in article
<8p6s5t$38m$1@nnrp1.deja.com>:
>80 class most likely would get FA's attension.
Why would FA want putt-putts anyway? It would be non-standard to anything
else they have. (Unless you use the old cliche "beggars can't be choosers")
>85 and 86 aren't good for FA :-)
Ohhh I wouldnt say that so much (-:
You could always have a few 86's running freights in the suburban areas,
and swap for much needed diesels outside the suburbs.
Then again, I'm dreaming again (-: Hand me those little green pills...
MK (:
- References:
- FA News
- From: "A.Tubbs" <atubbs@bigpond.net.au>
- Re: FA News
- From: "Railway Rasputin3" <jamesccj@optusnet.com.au>
- Re: FA News
- From: "Tezza" <tezza2000@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: FA News
- From: "Skippy" <fowler9@skippy9spammeifyoudare.fsnet.co.uk>
- Re: FA News
- From: "avachat" <avachat@dingoblue.net.au>
- Re: FA News
- From: Railway Rasputin3 <james_ccj@my-deja.com>