[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Port Pirie plant almost a reality

Subject: Re: Port Pirie plant almost a reality
From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 04:56:25 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: bleah
References: <Br_Q5.30$6B3.3853@news0.optus.net.au> <8v2cq2$n6q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A14B9CE.7DF2CC56@optushome.com.au>
User-Agent: Xnews/03.08.04
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:24480

Rob Kearey <mammal@optushome.com.au> wrote in article 
<3A14B9CE.7DF2CC56@optushome.com.au>:

>> Any one wanna bet who would be the carrier??

>South Maitland Railways. There's still lots of 10 class tanks around.

Bayside trains (Soon to be renamed to Baytop trains, in light of their 
amphibious trains). A number of amphibious Comengs will come to the rescue, 
of course!

M.

-- 
(To email me just remove ".spam" off my email address).

Whip me, Beat me, just don't Windows ME

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Port Pirie plant almost a reality
  - From: "James C." <james_ccj@my-deja.com>

References:
- Port Pirie plant almost a reality
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Port Pirie plant almost a reality
  - From: "James C." <james_ccj@my-deja.com>
- Re: Port Pirie plant almost a reality
  - From: Rob Kearey <mammal@optushome.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Govt defends fast train spending
Next by Date: Re: Locks fitted on NSW country trains
Prev by thread: Re: Port Pirie plant almost a reality
Next by thread: Re: Port Pirie plant almost a reality
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread