[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vic]minimum maintenance lines
- Subject: Re: [vic]minimum maintenance lines
- From: "James C." <james_ccj@my-deja.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 00:15:50 GMT
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
- References: <8frnhj$rfj$1@news1.wire.net.au>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:9197
In article <8frnhj$rfj$1@news1.wire.net.au>,
"andrei" <andrei@ausisp.com> wrote:
> found this while surfing through the department of infrastructure page
> from page 36 of
> http://www.doi.vic.gov.au/htmldocs/tranroad/Accesspaper.pdf
> 'Discussion Paper - Proposals for the implementation of the Victorian
Rail
> Access Regime'-April 2000,DoI Victoria.
>
> the following lines have an asterix after them, indicating that they
are
> minimum maintenance lines:
> Sale-Bairnsdale
> Toolamba-Echuca
> North Geelong-Fyansford
> Springhurst-Wahgunyah
> Strathmerton-Cobram
> Cranbourne-Nyora
> Ballarat-Ararat
> Heywood-Renmark
> Linton Junction-Redan
> Wodonga-Bandiana(BG)
While at the Department of infranstructure page, I'm gald to see
"Sprinter" and a B class tram in the page:-), finally trains/trams are
in the foucs.
Some other interesting things to read:
http://www.reggen.vic.gov.au/rail_1.htm
--
Cheers
James
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.