[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [VIC] Silver DRC :-)

Subject: Re: [VIC] Silver DRC :-)
From: mk@netstra.com.au (Michael Kurkowski)
Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 14:37:13 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: The Mad Gunzel Society
References: <39165178.33BA94FE@ozemail.com.au> <D0xR4.917$D9.692122@news0.optus.net.au> <8F2EE5B07telstraNews@139.130.239.94> <2gzR4.1131$D9.776246@news0.optus.net.au> <8F2F66EBtelstraNews@139.130.239.94> <p_zR4.14$uP3.18271@news0.optus.net.au> <8F2F966AtelstraNews@139.130.239.94> <y8AR4.18$uP3.24919@news0.optus.net.au>
User-Agent: Xnews/03.04.11
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:8381

daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au (Dave Proctor) wrote in
<y8AR4.18$uP3.24919@news0.optus.net.au>: 

>> I guess to answer this would be digging myself further into a hole.
>> BUT, look who's diesels lasted longer (: Victoria's first
>> diesel-electric B60 (now A60) is still running (despite refinements) -
>> This must say 
>> something.
>
>Indeed it does, it says that we have money to buy new, more efficient
>stuff, whereas you guys are broke and have to run your old stuff into
>the ground. 

If it ain't broke, why fix it?

Follow-Ups:
- Victoria Versus NSW
  - From: "James C." <james_ccj@my-deja.com>

References:
- [VIC] Silver DRC :-)
  - From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [VIC] Silver DRC :-)
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [VIC] Silver DRC :-)
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [VIC] Silver DRC :-)
  - From: mk@netstra.com.au (Michael Kurkowski)
- Re: [VIC] Silver DRC :-)
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
- Re: [VIC] Silver DRC :-)
  - From: mk@netstra.com.au (Michael Kurkowski)
- Re: [VIC] Silver DRC :-)
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [VIC] Silver DRC :-)
Next by Date: Re: Slogans
Prev by thread: Re: [VIC] Silver DRC :-)
Next by thread: Victoria Versus NSW
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread