[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Melb] New Timetables (VLP summary included)

Subject: Re: [Melb] New Timetables (VLP summary included)
From: Craig Haber <albatross@harnessnet.com.au>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 20:16:37 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Harness-Net
References: <8bs0en$203$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <cEiE4.43588$oD3.21939@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <8bsr8t$kj4$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <38e2ac12$1@news.iprimus.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:5051

Hi,

Steven Hurst wrote:

> With the proposed Suburban Line extension to Cgaigieburn (eventually) why
> not put in a crossover again, surely it is justified, now, and in the
> future?  Makes you wonder why they pulled it up in the first place -
> Typical!

You'd need to put in a crossover, then signal it, then re-establish it as a
block point, then employ a signalman there....on the other hand, Donnybrook
already has all the above, zero capital outlay, simply better utilisation of
what's already there.

Cheers,
CH.
--
Craig Haber
albatross@harnessnet.com.au
http://www.harnessnet.com.au/ch/
Proofread carefully to see if you any words out

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Melb] New Timetables (VLP summary included)
  - From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>

References:
- Re: [Melb] New Timetables (VLP summary included)
  - From: "Kym Columbine" <KymColumbine@bigpond.com>
- Re: [Melb] New Timetables (VLP summary included)
  - From: "Steven Hurst" <hurste@primus.com.au>

Prev by Date: ARHS Bulletin Costs
Next by Date: Re: [VIC] Heidelberg Re-signalling & Service alterations
Prev by thread: Re: [Melb] New Timetables (VLP summary included)
Next by thread: Re: [Melb] New Timetables (VLP summary included)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread